There can be no doubt that that humans are gregarious by nature
and tend to seek out other humans. Generally speaking, we all
want to be accepted by other humans. Nobody wants to be an
outcast, a freak and in fact, people with 'differences' often go
to extreme measures to cover up their abnormalities so that they
can get along in our society. Homosexuals were, for a long
time, hiding that fact in order to be accepted. Now it has
become 'in' to 'come out' and flaunt your homosexuality.
"They" say it is a matter of personal choice, they want to be
this way. 'OK.' Interesting that a drunk will tell you
they drink by choice or an 'addict' might tell you that they
"shoot up' by choice yet we consider both of these a 'disease'.
The Darwin theory says that for literally millions of years
natural selection is how we came to be. If you're a
creationist, well; they can argue that point better than I, but
we agree on this. There is absolutely no way with
either Darwinian or creationism that a 'gay' could naturally
exist unless you want to call an aberration of humanity
'natural.' To say this is a choice might be correct if you
put it into context as I have repeatedly pointed out in the
following text. If something has happened to a person be it in
the womb or during their growth that has affected their sexual
abilities, they are going to have problems, often, sexual
problems. To start labeling 'problems' as a choice is
ridiculous, but it is certainly an excellent cover.
It is also an excellent cover if you are a manufacture of a
product that has something in it that might be causing major
medical problems to the public.
I need to say a couple of things here. First of all, I am
speaking in generalities here and I am not saying that what
happens to one happens to another or the effect is the same or
the outcome is the same. With people, there are always
differences. One person may smoke their entire life without any
medical problems, yet another may get cancer from just being
near the first when they smoked.
Secondly, if you are a guy and youre born impotent, maybe your
testicles don't drop or you have a small penis, don't you think
that you might try to hide the fact or perhaps band together
with others that have similar outward symptoms (inabilities)?
Now; one point well taken is that there has been homosexuality
as far back as recorded history goes and obviously those people
didn't eat industrialized soybean or rape seed or had bodies
that contained over 400 substances that didn't exist in nature
30 years earlier. However, it would be hard to say what a
person was exposed to in days of old. For example, they
drank out of lead drinking goblets and thought nothing of
it. So who is to say?
There is a renowned Psychologist named Arthur Janov who has
strong evidence that at least some homosexuality is a mental
But that is all just the groundwork, the point of this document
is to show how good old fashioned "greed" is poisoning America
and the world for that matter and homosexuality is being used as
a cover to distract from discovering what is happening.
I get a lot (about half) of my information from Science News
(SN) magazine that collects their articles from noted
scientists, doctors, mathematicians, etc. around the
world. Here is my proof, I have yet to see any from the
Methylation turns a wannabe bumblebee into
Bumblebees in an established hive live a high school rom-com
social life. At the center table is the queen bee, surrounded by
males that she created. On the outskirts sit the worker-bee
nerds, all female, doomed to never get a date or form a hive of
their own. But as in the movie Mean Girls,
when the queen bee goes down, sometimes a worker has a chance to
claw her way toward the throne. Which wannabee rises to
the top is more than personality or fashion sense. Its a matter
In the rigid social structure of a bumblebee (Bombus
terrestris) hive, the queen does the breeding and the
workers do the working. But when a queen goes missing, starts
making males and new queens, or even simply gets old, some of
the worker females rise up in revolt. They become more
aggressive, their ovaries develop and they start laying eggs to
produce their own males. They will never be a true queen bee,
but laying their own eggs puts them in competition.
So what happens when a pregnant mother is exposed to
Chemical tags on DNA appear to differ
between gay and straight men
BALTIMORE Molecular tests may be able to distinguish
homosexual from heterosexual men, a small study of twins
Chemical modifications to DNA that change the activity of genes
without changing the genes information differ between
homosexual and heterosexual men, researchers from UCLA David
Geffen School of Medicine have discovered. Results of the
unpublished study on the link between these modifications,
called epigenetic tags, and sexual orientation were presented
October 8 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Human
Genetics. Comparing one type of epigenetic tag known as DNA
methylation in pairs of twins in which one brother is gay and
the other straight revealed patterns that distinguish one group
from the other about 67 percent of the time, computational
geneticist Tuck Ngun and colleagues say.
The work already has provoked controversy, with some scientists
questioning its methodology and others worried about how the
research could be used. Some are concerned that the research
could be misinterpreted as one step in an effort to cure
homosexuality. Nothing could be further from the researchers
intentions, say Ngun and Eric Vilain, the geneticist who heads
the research group. None of us see homosexuality as a disorder
or something to be fixed, Ngun said. Were just interested in
what makes us tick.
Very little is known about how human sexual preferences of any
type arise, Vilain adds. Thats especially true on a biological
level. Our research is not about homosexuality, he says. Its
about understanding sexual attraction, the biology of desire.
studies have found tentative genetic links to male sexual
orientation, but no one has identified a gay gene or genes.
Still, the development of sexuality seems to have origins early
in life, maybe even stemming from cues in the womb. For
instance, for each biological older brother a man has, his
likelihood of being homosexual rises by 33 percent. That finding
has been replicated in several studies and could indicate that
some condition in the womb sets epigenetic marks, which later
influence preference of sexual partners.
A Science Primer
Hormones: "Endocrinology 101"
Hormone are released by various glands throughout the body.
They act as chemical messengers guiding vital processes
including the regulation of metabolism, reproduction, mental
processes, and many aspects of development before birth.
The bodies chemical communications system has two basic
components: though hormones themselves and special molecules,
known as receptors, that receive the chemical messages. The body
has hundreds of different kinds of receptors, each one designed
to receive a particular kind of signal.
Hormones in the News
PBS Environmental Hormones in the News, News stories on
environmental threats from hormone mimics abound these days.
Many focus on the potential breast-cancer risks posed by a
woman's exposure to pollutants that function like estrogen.
Then there are the reproductive scares. In certain wildlife
populations, females appear to have lost the ability to
successfully reproduce. In others, male animals have been born with feminized reproductive organs.
There are even provocative, though spotty, human data suggesting
that males may be suffering from unusual rates of genital malformations
and testicular cancer, and from unusually low rates of sperm
Perhaps most troubling, the proportion of male births appears
to be waning in many industrial countries. The source of the
pollutants suspected of triggering at least some of these dire
effects include common pesticides, plasticizers, fuel additives,
and surfactants. Not only do trace quantities of them lace our
air and drinking water, but some have been detected leaching
into our foods--from plastic lined cans, from plastic coated
papers, and from plastic bottles. Look it up, read the
rest, I didn't make this up.
Science News 8/5/00 p.94
Estrogen-mimicking pollutants can trigger gender-bending effects
in wildlife. For instance, male fish exposed to such hormonally
active pollutants will make vitellogenin an egg-yolk protein
that's normally fashioned only by females (SN: 1/8/94, p. 24). A
new study finds that once initially spurred to make
vitellogenin, males don't need a steady bath of estrogen to
maintain high levels of the motherly protein.
Grace H. Panter of AstraZaneca in Brixham, England, and her
colleagues exposed male fathead minnows to up to 120 parts per trillion (ppt)
estrogen in water for 3 or 6 weeks. Some fish lived in tanks
continuously laced with the hormone. Other fish spent half their
time in clean water, either every other day or 3 days straight
of every 6.
Minnows intermittently exposed to 120 ppt estrogen produced
almost as much vitellogenin as those continuously bathed in that
amount, Painter's team found. These fish also had roughly seven
times as much vitellogenin as did males that had been
continuously exposed to 60 ppt-the average amount the
intermittent group experienced.
Most unexpectedly, even long interludes in clean water didn't
substantially erase the hormone's impact. Male minnows spending
3 weeks in 120 ppt estrogen, followed by an equal time in clean
water, ended up with vitellogenin concentrations " not
significantly different" from those of fish that had spent the
entire 6 weeks in the estrogen-tainted water, note Panter and
They report their findings in the July 1 Environmental Science
No one yet knows what the long-term consequences are for male
fish that have made vitellogenin. However, members of Panter's
team previously showed that exposure to estrogenic pollution
during a male fish's development can stunt the growth of its
testes (SN: 2/26/94 p.142).
Science News December 6,
by J. Raloff
Estrogen is usually described as the animal kingdom's primary
female sex hormone. That's a gross oversimplification, however.
Even that quintessentially male preserve -- the sperm -- depends
on estrogen, scientists report this week. Without estrogen,
males are infertile.
The new study, by Rex A. Hess at the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign and his colleagues, focuses on estrogen's role
in male reproductive
function. Nevertheless, the researchers observe that
their findings also suggest a mechanism by which DDT and other
estrogen-mimicking pollutants (SN: 7/3/93, p. 10) could wreak
havoc on fertility. If these weak estrogen's displace the body's
more potent natural ones, they might diminish estrogen exposure
-- and sperm activity (SN: 1/22/94, p. 56).
Hess and his colleagues study mutant mice. These animals were
bred to produce estrogen normally, but they lack the gene for an
estrogen receptor -- a protein that allows cells to take up the
hormone. As a result, the mice cannot respond to the estrogen in
Since this hormone plays a pivotal feminizing role in development,
Did you read that? "Feminizing role"
Look it up, read the rest, I didn't make this up. Good thing
it only happens to fish, sic. The article also contains a
long list of references.
DO GENES DETERMINE WHETHER
WE ARE LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, OR STRAIGHT?
Position Paper by The Council for Responsible
Science News March 23, 2002 pg 181
Three years of work by U.S.
government scientists have identified at least 82 drugs,
hormones, and other organic compounds that pollute
national waterways. The individual contaminants, ranging from
insect repellents to cattle antibiotics, appear at low
concentrations. An independent study, however, indicates that
the combined effects of such chemicals may
Taken together, the findings are
"quite disturbing," says Ana M. Soto, an endocrinologist at
Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston.
Past research has documented drugs,
pesticides, and other contaminants in wastewater's in Europe
(SN: 3/21/98, p. 187:
Canada (SN: 4/1/00, p. 212:
http://www.sciencenews.org/20000401/fob1.asp). The new study
by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is the first to
thoroughly examine these substances in U.S. waterways. Earlier
reports from the data had already indicated that several
organic compounds turn up in drinking water (SN: 11/3/01, p.
Look it up, read the rest, I didn't make this up.
Science News Week of Feb. 5, 2000; Vol. 157, No. 6 pg.87
Injecting into fish eggs an
estrogen-mimicking form of the pesticide DDT transforms genetically male
medaka fish into apparent females able to lay eggs that
produce young. Again, lucky it only happens to fish,
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Male frogs exposed to even very low doses of
a common weed killer can develop multiple sex organs --
sometimes both male and female -- researchers in California have
discovered. "I was very much surprised," at the impact of
atrazine on developing frogs, said Tyrone B. Hayes of the
University of California at Berkeley. Atrazine is the most
commonly used weed killer in North America, he said, and can be
found in rainwater, snow runoff and ground water.
Huh! Frogs too. Good thing it
doesn't happen to humans, sic.
Washington Toxics Coalition
Limits on Human Evidence
There are enormous barriers to obtaining human evidence linking
pollutants to health problems. It is called
millions in re-election dollars.
Science News Volume 155, Number 20 (May 15, 1999)
References & Sources
Of the three estrogen-mimicking compounds in soy, glycitein
occurs in the smallest quantities, but it appears the most
potent and readily absorbed. Soy can be
found in %60 of food eaten today.
Science News Week of May 26, 2001; Vol. 159,
Promotes frog deformities
Agricultural pollutants may conspire with parasites to derail
frog development in many regions of North America, according to
a new study.
Malformed frogs with bent spines and extra or missing hind
limbshave been documented since the 1700s. However, since 1994,
when Minnesota school children found deformities in many of the
frogs they caught, unusually large numbers of malformed frogs
have turned up from California to eastern
Canada. Huh! Frogs
too. Good thing it doesn't happen to humans, sic.
New(?) Concerns about Phthalates
Ingredients of common plastics, may harm boys as they develop.
S/N Vol 158 #10
Phthalates. Difficult to spell and harder to sound out, this
class of compounds would be forgettable if name didn't keep
popping up in debates over the safety of intravenous-blood bags,
food packaging, and children's toys.
Phthalates have become ubiquitous in modern society. Some of
these oily substances find use as solvents, but most serve as
softeners that make riged materials turn flexible. Worldwide,
manufacturers produce an estimated billion pounds of phthalates
annually. The EPA tested
phthalates and found them to be safe. The only problem
with that was the millions the plastics industry has donated to
politicians (if it was "safe" what would they have to worry
about?) and phthalates were tested by themselves.
Despite a half century of apparently safe use, several
environmental and health groups and the U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission in late 1998 called for the manufacturers of
toys, baby pacifiers, and medical supplies to remove the most
toxic of these chemicals from their products. At that time,
scientists had linked cancer in adults to heavy exposure to some
phthalates, animal studies had indicated that phthalates can
cause organ damage, and chemists had demonstrated that
phthalates could leak from plastics during use.
Complete article can be found at Science
News Online. week of Sept 2, 2000.
More than Skin Deep? SN July 20, 2002 Vol 163 #3
Beauty products may damage fetal development
A new report shows that many cosmetics contain phthalates--a
class of chemicals known to cause developmental deformities in
animals. The report, from three environmental-advocacy groups,
recommends that women of childbearing age avoid using these
The study finds that many beauty products including some
deodorants, fragrances, lotions, and hair sprays contain
phthalates but that most omit the chemicals from the ingredients
lists. Do a WEB search for yourself, look
this stuff up, I'm not making it up.
Magazine Vol155 #19 May 8 1999
By J. Raloff
have identified the likely culprit behind some historic,
regional declines in Atlantic salmon. The researchers find that
a near ubiquitous water pollutant can render young, migrating
fish unable to survive a life at sea.
spring spraying of forests with a pesticide laced with
nonylphenol during the 1970s and '80s was the clue that led
the biologists to unmask that chemical's role in the
transitory decline of salmon in East Canada. Though these
sprays have ended, concentrations of nonylphenols in forest
runoff then were comparable to those in the effluent of some
pulp mills, industrial facilities, and sewage treatment
plants today. Downstream of such areas, the scientists
argue, salmon and other migratory fish may still be at risk.
surfactants used in products from pesticides to dishwashing
detergents, cosmetics, plastics, and spermicidal. Because
waste-treatment plants don't remove nonylphenols well, these
chemicals can build up in downstream waters (SN: 1/8/94, p.
Excreted antibiotics can poison plants
Patrick K. Jemba was curious about the interplay of protozoa
and the bacteria they eat in soil. As part of his research, he
began altering the organisms' environment. When he applied large
amounts of protozoan-killing antibiotics to dirt around the
roots of soybeans, Jemba was amazed at what happened. The drugs
widely used in human and veterinary medicine did far more than
subtly alter the balance of microbial predators and prey. One
drug stunted soybeans, and another killed the
Science News January 8, 1994
Are environmental "hormones," emasculating wildlife?
BY JANET RALOFF
Mother Nature. The term conjures up images of a warm,
nurturing, bountiful environment. But this sobriquet is proving
increasingly apt for another reason--one that should offer
anything but comfort.
New studies suggest that through pollution and other
environmental factors, Mother Nature is exerting a feminizing hormonal influence
on the animal kingdom.
I put something together the other day while thinking about the
government and the way they will say anything or do anything to
stay in power. Perhaps I'm losing it entirely but this makes
perfect sense to me.
The idea sounded pretty
crazy until I looked up who was paying politicians the big
bucks. I may not be exactly right, although I am trying to
be accurate, but there is obviously something being overlooked
these days be it intentional or by accident.
I was thinking about those rare but ocassional people they find
with wading boots caught inside the lower part of out-houses
that have a fetish for watching women take a dump.
Gross I know, but there are a few. They have a
scientific name for it, but it doesn't matter. It is
sick, really really sick and it isn't a choice.
I would like to add one more little caveat here. SN Vol 165
# 21 (May 22, 2004) has a little blurb: "Filtered air cuts down
mutations. The microscopic particles cause heritable
mutations by damaging the DNA of cells that give rise to sperm,
" Now, while I feel this makes perfect sense to
support my theory and there are hundreds of articles similar to
this, that is only part of the story.
Elsewhere I was reading how scientists have found that DNA mutates
at a very stable rate over long periods of time.
Figuring how long man has been on earth and how much genes mutated
as compared to how much they should have mutated, they say there
should be much more diversity in this world (in human beings) than
there is. They also have a theory telling why they figure
that happened. So what I'm trying to get at with all this
argument is, 'don't tell me your gay by choice, it isn't
helping.' Lets say it like it is and get on with it.