We are loosing the US of A.
Political attempts to take away all our freedoms...
EXPOSED: Eric Holder Used Taxpayer Dollars to Stoke Anti-Police Hatred in Ferguson
The violent protests in Ferguson angered Americans all around the nation.
Now it turns out that those same angry Americans may have
helped pay for them.
Department of Justice records obtained late last month by Judicial Watch in response to an Aug. 14 Freedom of Information Act request indicate that the department spent at least $15,000 sending eight Community Relations Service agents to the troubled Missouri town.
More troubling is the fact that the agents were dispatched upon the request of “the far-left NAACP,” according to Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.
The NAACP complained about police violence in Ferguson,
describing officers as “an invading army” on a website
related to the Aug. 9 shooting of Michael Brown by
Ferguson Police officer Darren Wilson, who has since
resigned from the force.
The site also demanded that “justice for Michael is served,” according to Judicial Watch.
Ferguson Mayor James Knowles reportedly said that CRS agents were training demonstrators.
And their own records indicate that the government agents took part in at least one demonstration.
“An August 16 expense claim is for ‘rain ponchos for demonstration site,'” Judicial Watch reported. “August 16, 2014, was a day of terrible rioting in Ferguson.”
Fitton said that this evidence demonstrates that administration claims to be objective with regard to the race riots are not credible.
“The CRS and the Justice Department under Eric Holder have shown little inclination to enforce the law in a race-neutral manner,” he said. “Justice Department employees dropping everything to rush to the side of the far-left NAACP speaks volumes as to what CRS is up to.
“Given Obama’s and Holder’s incendiary racial remarks on Ferguson and criticism of the police, no one is fooled by Justice Department protestations that its taxpayer-funded community organizers in Ferguson are neutral,” Fitton continued. “It is no surprise that rioting worsened with increased involvement of the racially-biased Justice Department.”
Moreover, Fitton said, Holder’s Department of Justice has violated the FOIA law with regard to disclosing its full involvement in the Ferguson protests.
“The Justice Department has yet to comply with Freedom of Information Act law and provide all of the responsive documents about what it is up to in Ferguson. Disclosure is urgent and this new Holder cover-up must end,” Fitton concluded.
None of this should come as any surprise to conservatives who have been paying attention to the lawless actions of this administration.
CRS is the same organization that sent agitators to Sanford, Fla., to protest against the innocent George Zimmerman after the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.
And it has been the DOJ that has kept the possibility of civil rights prosecution against Zimmerman alive since his acquittal, despite overwhelming evidence that race played no role in that shooting.
Why should we expect anything different in Ferguson?
BOMBSHELL: Hillary Will Refuse to Hand Over Her Benghazi Notes to Trey Gowdy [VIDEO]
Refusing to cooperate with an investigation into a government cover up isn’t the best way to persuade people of your innocence in the matter.
Unfortunately, that bit of common sense seems to have
flown over the head of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
who is refusing to hand over her notes on the Benghazi terrorist attack to Rep. Trey Gowdy and the select
committee investigating the incident.
Lying is something that comes naturally to the former first lady as she’s done a lot of it to further her career. Clinton lied while on a Watergate investigation committee, and bent the truth to help a child rapist escape prison, so no cause is too nefarious for her to employ her “talents.”
According to the Washington Free Beacon, Cynthia
McFadden conducted an interview with Hillary
Clinton from NBC Nightly News, where
she stated that she had no plans of handing over her notes
to Gowdy, and said she was sketchy about testifying
because she didn’t want to “politicize” the matter.
It’s Time to Kick ISIS Members Out of America
Every week brings new reports of Muslims in America flocking to join ISIS. Those who aren’t killed in battle will eventually return to New York, to Los Angeles and to Minneapolis–Saint Paul.
And they will stop being Iraq’s problem and become our
ISIS is more than just another terrorist group. It is now an Islamic State. Its followers and allied militias pledge to obey the Caliph of ISIS and reject all allegiances to other states and entities. Western ISIS recruits burn their passports to show that they are no longer citizens of those countries.
Like most Salafists, ISIS members see our system of law and government as idolatry and heresy. Fort Hood Jihadist Nidal Hasan, who recently applied to join ISIS, had earlier written that he would “renounce any oaths of allegiances that require me to support/defend any man made constitution (like the Constitution of the United States) over the commandments mandated in Islam.”
“I therefore formally renounce my oath of office as well as any other implicit or explicit oaths I have made in the past … This includes my oath of U.S. citizenship,” Hasan declared.
By his own admission, Nidal Hasan is no longer a United States citizen. He should be promptly denaturalized. So should every ISIS member and anyone who supports the Islamic State.
The oath of citizenship that Hasan was retroactively rejecting states, “I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen.”
Obama's FBI Claims US Citizens Fighting With ISIS “Entitled” to Return Home
If the American public has not come to the realization that many in the federal government have developed some form of insanity, the remarks issued by FBI director James Comey should remove all doubt. In an interview with "60 minutes," Comey indicated the FBI was aware of a dozen or so American citizens who are fighting with ISIS, knows exactly who these individuals are, and that these individuals are "entitled" to return to the US after fighting unless their passport is revoked. Comey stated, "Ultimately, an American citizen, unless their passport's been revoked, is entitled to come back. So, someone who's fought with ISIL, with an American passport wants to come back, we will track them very carefully."
In other words, every Muslim American citizen with a passport could go fight alongside ISIS, then come back to the US via international air travel, only to be "tracked" by the government when they return home. Non-muslims American citizens, who are sympathetic to ISIS, could do the same thing. While the NSA spies upon innocent American citizens who have no ties to terrorists, Christians and patriots targeted as "dissidents," those opposed to the current administration are targeted by the IRS, and climate change deniers are considered threats, the federal government has boldly stated those individuals engaged in "treasonous activities" and "fighting alongside an enemy of the US" are "entitled" to return to America because they are citizens.
Congress 'endorses' Warrant-less collection, storage of U.S. communications
With nearly no public notice or debate, Congress on Wednesday approved legislation that critics say blesses the warrantless collection, dissemination and five-year retention of everyday Americans’ phone and Internet communications.
The controversial language was quietly incorporated into an intelligence authorization bill that passed the Senate on Tuesday and then the House on Wednesday.
The legislation, privacy advocates say, sanctions for the first time the executive branch’s warrantless collection of American communications under Executive Order 12333, issued in 1981 to authorize the interception of communications overseas.
Section 309 of the intelligence bill sets a five-year limit, with many exceptions, on the retention of U.S. persons' communications collected under that order, which was issued well before widespread use of cellphones and the Internet.
Members of Rep. Justin Amash’s staff noticed the section Wednesday morning, and the Michigan Republican rushed to the House floor, rallied opposition with a letter to colleagues and secured a roll call vote.
But opponents failed to defeat the bill, which passed 325-100 and now heads to President Barack Obama for his signature.
“This whole thing is so upsetting to me,” says John Napier Tye, a former State Department Internet policy official who went public as a whistleblower in July. Tye warns that U.S. spy agencies can evade congressional oversight and use the order to scoop up vast amounts of American communications routinely routed through foreign cables and servers.
“It is good that Congress is trying to regulate 12333 activities,” Tye says. “But the language in this bill just endorses a terrible system that allows the NSA to take virtually everything Americans do online and use it however it wants according to the rules it writes.” He says that includes sharing the intercepts with foreign governments and domestic law enforcement.
Right to Assembly,
one of the basic rights in the constitution.
Congress passed a bill that all they have to do is send
someone from the government to the assembly and that would
make it illegal.