Gun Control

Something to Digest and Pass Along to everybody.

---

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.

From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1911, Turkey established gun control.

From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Germany established gun control in 1938.

From 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

China established gun control in 1935.

From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Guatemala established gun control in 1964.

From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Uganda established gun control in 1970.

From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Cambodia established gun control in 1956.

From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

2012: Venezuelans lose right to own firearms.

2016: Venezuelans are eating cats and dogs to survive.

2019: Venezuelans are fired upon by their own civilians to keep them from receiving humanitarian aid.

Obama Takes First Step to Ban All Firearms.

With guns, we are citizens. without them, we are subjects. Something to think about... Don't let the liberal media control your mind (If you value your freedom)

The United States ranks 3rd in Murders throughout the World. But if you take out Chicago , Detroit , Washington DC and New Orleans, the United States is 4th from the Bottom for Murders. These 4 Cities also have the toughest Gun Control Laws in the United States. All 4 are also controlled by Democrats.

OBAMA'S and (liberals in general) GUN CONTROL UNDER THE RADAR
"Complete Disarmament" of the American people.

"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim that can do it. the felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge or jury. therefore, what he must be taught to fear is his victim." Lt. Col. Jeff Cooper, USMC

FIREARMS REFRESHER COURSE

It is not the individual we need to be worried about. There is always going to be somebody, a Hitler, a Stalin, a Mao, a Pol Pot, Cortez, an Omar, and the fools that follow them. It is the idea that big government is going to 'take care of us' and 'make everything right' that we have to worry about. Government isn't a thing, it is us. I believe right now; it is the standing army of individuals with weapons; that stands between us and total tyranny. Get rid of the arms and people like the Clinton's and Pelosi's will be the one's in control.

There are places where firearms are not allowed and only the authorities are allowed to have any and it is true there are virtually no deaths from firearms but prisons are supposed to be for felons, not the common people.

www.dumbellnebula.com/politicians.htm /politics.htm

Remember “Fast and Furious?” The obama/Holder deal where they allowed guns to be purchased and taken to Mexico? Allegedly something about “tracking” killlers? It's real reason was to CAUSE murders along the borders to give them an excuse to ban the sale of arms in the US. Our democrat illegal president and his attorney general.

A short video, for as long as it is available. Very good and to the point.



file guncontrolstealth is appended here.

OBAMA'S GUN CONTROL UNDER THE RADAR

allegedly By CHUCK NORRIS | 8/24/11 4:34 AM EDT

Not long ago, the gun control advocates Jim and Sarah Brady visited the White House. President Barack Obama reportedly told them that he was working on new gun control schemes “under the radar.”

It’s been said that guns have two enemies — rust and politicians. Rust never sleeps, and neither do those who would seek to restrict our constitutional rights. So let me tell you about a meeting you weren’t invited to, where those people were planning an attack on our rights that’s very much “under the radar.”

It happened in July at the United Nations headquarters in New York, at a meeting to draft of what they call the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty.

An Arms Trade Treaty doesn’t sound bad in concept — isn’t that what the U.N. is for? The problem, however, is what U.N. diplomats consider to be “arms.” To you and me, the word means tanks, fighter jets, missiles, that kind of thing. But look no further than the U.N. plaza to see what the silk-stocking set considers “arms.” There you will find a bronze statue of a simple .38 revolver — with its barrel tied into a knot.

Remember no other country in the world enjoys America’s constitutional right to keep and bear arms. This is why the vast majority of U.N. diplomats believe that an arms trade treaty must reach into your gun safe and mine. There is little question that this treaty would require additional restrictions on our Second Amendment rights.

Consider the comments of a spokesman from “Project Ploughshares,” a Canadian arms control group. “From a humanitarian perspective,” the spokesman told the Canadian Postmedia News “all firearms need to be controlled, and that’s the bottom line.”

This attitude has spooked even Canada’s government, which typically embraces a disarmament agenda. During the meeting, Canada put forth a panicky petition for a hunting rifle exemption in the treaty. Mexico immediately objected.

For an administration with a secretive itch for gun control, the situation is ideal. They can let the United Nations do the dirty work of drafting onerous new restrictions on civilian firearms, then package them inside a treaty with legitimate measures to control true military armaments.

The U.N. has scheduled the treaty to be finished in July of next year — just in time to go to the Obama White House for ratification.

That’s “under the radar” for you.

But one risk of operating under the radar is that you can’t see the moves of your opponents. This is not the first U.N. gun-control rodeo for my friends at the National Rifle Association. They know treaty ratification requires a two-thirds vote in the Senate. Thirty-four senators would have to vote no to block the treaty.

While the rest of Washington was fixated on the debt ceiling debate, the NRA quietly marshaled opposition to the treaty among pro-gun senators.

Fifty-eight senators have now called out the president on his plan. Led by Sens. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.), 45 Republicans and 13 Democrats have written two strong letters —one from members of each party — to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. All the senators have vowed to oppose any treaty that restricts civilian firearm ownership.

What’s ironic is that the United States already has the world’s pre-eminent system for regulation of true military arms sales. If the rest of the world merely adopted the U.S. regulatory regime, there would be no need for an Arms Trade Treaty.

But rather than harmonize other nations’ patchy regulations on arms transfers, the diplomatic crowd would rather force Washington to hew to its utopian vision of global disarmament.

If this were only a partisan exercise in bashing Obama and the U.N., one could be forgiven for concluding it has no substance. But 13 Democratic senators clearly think otherwise — a sign that this debate is far from over.

Chuck Norris, an actor, martial artist and author, is the honorary chairman of the National Rifle Association’s voter registration program, Trigger the Vote.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61942.html#ixzz1WMldTZMP

Thank you

I know, snopes says Chuck Norris didn't say this.  Well, I don't know for sure, I do know that if it is about obama, snopes lies and that is a fact and proof is on the WEB site.  Even if Chuck didn't say the above, the fact that ob and his gang are trying to do this very thing is well documented on the WEB and on this WEB site.      Thanks..

file sofaustguns.htm is appended here.

Aussie Gun Grab: One Year Results.

(The following was E-Mail to S. O. F. by and Australian chief of police) (SOF Mag. Feb. 2002)

I thought you would like to see the real figures from down under. It has now been 12 months since the gun owners in Australia were forced by a new gun law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our government, a program costing Australian taxpayers more than $500 million.

The first year results are now in. Australia wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent. Australia wide, assaults are up 6.6 percent. Australia wide, armed robbery are up 44 percent (yes 44 percent). Any state of Victoria alone, homicides with farms are up 300 percent. (Note that wild law-abiding citizens turned them in the criminals did not an criminal still possessing guns!)

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed. There has also been a dramatic increase in breaking-ins and assaults of the elderly. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in "successfully ridding Australian society of guns."

You won't see this data on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the state assembly disseminating this information. The Australian experience proves it. Guns in the hands-of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.

The giant, gaping hole in xxx NewtonMass x htm Sandy Hook reporting

There Was A Mass Shooting NOBODY’S Talking About, Care To Guess Why?

Data Provides Ample Evidence Why Law-Abiding Citizens Own Firearms

Corrupt Laws protect the criminal. Politicians are criminals, for the most part. Get it?

Take note Americans, before it's too late!

---